Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2020. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@hugomrdias
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@hugomrdias hugomrdias changed the base branch from master to refactor/async-iterables2 January 21, 2020 15:14
@hugomrdias hugomrdias requested a review from alanshaw January 21, 2020 15:14
@hugomrdias hugomrdias requested a review from alanshaw January 21, 2020 17:05
@alanshaw alanshaw force-pushed the refactor/async-iterables2 branch 2 times, most recently from 08425af to a27302d Compare January 23, 2020 13:10
@alanshaw alanshaw changed the base branch from refactor/async-iterables2 to master January 24, 2020 07:23
@alanshaw
Copy link
Contributor

@hugomrdias would you mind rebasing this so I can look at just your changes?

@hugomrdias hugomrdias force-pushed the refactor/async-iterables2-examples branch from e79bd13 to ffaaee9 Compare January 24, 2020 14:50
@hugomrdias
Copy link
Contributor Author

done

Copy link
Contributor

@alanshaw alanshaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes LGTM but why have you removed the browserify example?

@hugomrdias
Copy link
Contributor Author

browserify doesn't support deps that use esm.

@achingbrain
Copy link
Collaborator

Could we use something like this to support esm in browserify? https://github.com/mattdesl/esmify

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Feb 3, 2020

@alanshaw
Copy link
Contributor

alanshaw commented Feb 4, 2020

I'm going to merge this so that we have up to date examples for the official release and open an issue so that we can get a browserify example re-added.

@alanshaw alanshaw merged commit 74a9147 into master Feb 4, 2020
@alanshaw alanshaw deleted the refactor/async-iterables2-examples branch February 4, 2020 11:28
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants